God is one, without parent or child. Jesus is the Messiah and servant of God—not God Himself.
Below you’ll find the plain verses, a fair Unitarian vs Trinitarian comparison, and a concise history from
Tertullian of Carthage to Nicaea and beyond.
Both the Bible and the Qur’an testify that Jesus (peace be upon him) came from a real, human family. This alone shows he is part of creation, not the Creator.
From the Qur’an
Mother: Mary (Maryam), the chaste and chosen woman (Qur’an 3:42, 19:16-21).
Maternal Uncle: Aaron (Harun) — mentioned as her brother in lineage (Qur’an 19:28).
Grandparents: From the family of ʿImrān (Qur’an 3:33-35) — her father ʿImrān and mother (Hannah in later tradition).
From the Bible
Mother: Mary, a young woman from Nazareth (Luke 1:26-31).
Maternal Relative: Elizabeth, wife of Zechariah, “of the daughters of Aaron” (Luke 1:5, 1:36).
Forefathers: Traced through David’s line via genealogies in Matthew 1 and Luke 3.
Having a mother, extended family, and human lineage shows that Jesus was born into the world like any other man. The Creator has no parents, uncles, or grandparents — “He begets not, nor is He begotten” (Qur’an 112:3).
Three Pillars of the Case
Short, checkable points from scripture and straightforward logic.
✓God is without origin
A being with no beginning cannot be begotten. Begetting implies origin; God has none.
Qur’an 112:3 · Isaiah 44:6
✓Jesus was born, prayed, obeyed
Jesus had a mother, prayed to God, and called the Father “my God.” This shows distinction, not identity.
Luke 1:31 · Mark 14:36 · John 20:17
✓“Son of God” ≠ “God the Son”
In scripture, “son of” often means chosen/representative. The title marks mission, not essence.
1 Tim 2:5 · idiom: “sons of the prophets”
Unitarian vs Trinitarian — Key Differences
Snapshot of claims measured against the core verse.
Topic
Unitarian
Trinitarian
Notes
God’s Nature
One Person — the Father
One Being; three co-equal Persons
Isa 45:22; Deut 6:4; Qur’an 112
Jesus’ Identity
Messiah, servant, Son (title)
Eternal divine Son; incarnate
Luke 1–2; John 1 (Trin. reading)
Prayer & Dependence
Prays to God; receives authority
Human nature prays; divine does not
Mark 14:36; John 5:30; 17:3
“Begetting”
Literal begetting cannot apply to God
“Eternal generation” (timeless)
Qur’an 112 vs metaphysics
Worship
Worship God alone
Worship Father, Son, Spirit
Deut 6:4; John 4:23-24
How the Trinity Idea Took Shape
The New Testament doesn’t contain the word “Trinity.” The doctrine developed over centuries through debates and councils.
Tertullian of Carthage (c.155–c.240)
A North-African (Carthaginian) theologian often credited with introducing Latin terms like Trinitas and persona. He argued for one divine substantia (substance) shared by Father, Son, and Spirit, while still distinguishing them as persons. His model sought to defend Christ’s exalted status against rival views.
Key: coined language and categories later used in creeds.
From Debates to Creeds
Nicaea (325) affirmed the Son as “of one substance” (homoousios) with the Father, responding to subordinationist views (often called “Arian”). Constantinople (381) expanded this, treating the Spirit as fully divine. These creeds formalized concepts that are not laid out in one place in scripture.
Key: creed first, then later biblical proof-texting to fit the creed.
Unitarian Currents
Across history, currents insisting on the Father’s sole deity persisted: early Jewish-Christian groups (often labeled “Ebionites”), later rational dissenters, and modern Unitarians and Muslims. Common thread: God is one Person; Jesus is His Messiah and servant.
Key: continuity of strict monotheism.
Timeline (very short)
1st century — Jesus and apostles proclaim one God (the Father). Jesus is Messiah, raised by God.
2nd–3rd — Conceptual experimentation; Trinitas language popularized by Tertullian (Carthage).
325 — Council of Nicaea: “of one substance” Father–Son.
381 — Constantinople: Spirit’s deity defined; Trinity more fixed in creed.
Often translated “only-begotten,” but many scholars take it as “unique/one-of-a-kind.” If “unique,” it doesn’t teach literal divine begetting.
Sense: uniqueness of the Son’s role, not origin within God.
“Son of God” (royal, messianic title)
Biblically used for kings, Israel, and the righteous. For Jesus, it marks his messianic authority granted by God—not identity as God Himself.
See 2 Sam 7; Ps 2; Luke 1.
“I and the Father are one” (John 10:30)
Unitarian reading: unity of mission/authority, not identity of essence. Compare John 17:11, 21 where disciples are to be “one” in the same manner.
“The Word was God” (John 1:1)
Trinitarian reading: personal deity of the Son pre-incarnate. Unitarian response: “God’s self-expression/wisdom” (logos) embodied in the man Jesus; grammar and context allow a qualitative sense (“divine”).
Common Proof-Texts — Quick Replies
Thomas: “My Lord and my God” (John 20:28)
Recognition of God’s power at work in the risen Messiah; titles can reflect agency (the one who represents God bears God’s name/authority). Jesus still says “my God” (20:17), keeping the hierarchy clear.
“Who, being in the form of God…” (Phil 2:6-11)
Unitarian reading: Christ, in God’s image/privilege, chose humble obedience; God exalted him (he didn’t exalt himself). Exaltation by Another implies subordination.
“Before Abraham was, I am” (John 8:58)
Idiomatic for precedence/authority from God’s plan; or echoing divine mission language. The passage still depicts a prophet authorized by God, not the Source Himself.
“Baptize… in the name of the Father, Son, Spirit” (Matt 28:19)
A triadic formula doesn’t equal a triune ontology; scripture has many triads without teaching co-equality or consubstantiality.
FAQ
Is this anti-Christian?
No. It’s pro-Jesus and pro-scripture: worship the Father, the only true God (John 17:3), honor the Messiah whom God raised and exalted (Acts 2:36).
Do Unitarians deny Jesus’ miracles or resurrection?
No. They affirm God empowered Jesus with miracles and raised him from the dead—while keeping God and His Messiah distinct.
Where did the Trinity come from then?
From attempts to explain Father-Son-Spirit relations using philosophical terms. Tertullian (Carthage) popularized Latin categories; later councils fixed the creed. The exact creedal wording is not found as a single statement in scripture.
Is “eternal generation” biblical?
It’s a theological construct meant to avoid saying the Son has a beginning in time, but scripture never uses the phrase or explains the mechanism.
What’s the simplest takeaway?
The Creator is one, without parent or child. Jesus is His anointed servant and messenger. Believe in God, follow the Messiah.
References (quick list)
Scripture
Deut 6:4 — The LORD is one.
Isaiah 44–45 — God alone.
John 17:3 — Father, the only true God.
John 20:17 — “My God and your God.”
1 Tim 2:5 — One God, one mediator, the man Christ Jesus.
Qur’an 112 — He begets not, nor is He begotten.
Historical
Tertullian (Carthage): Adversus Praxean — early Latin usage of Trinitas, persona, substantia.